Three-time Norwegian prime minister and former WHO director-general Gro Harlem Brundtland on Monday spoke at Academia Sinica about her struggles to help Taiwan during the 2003 SARS epidemic in the face of Chinese pressure.
Brundtland, who won the Tang Prize in 2014, said the WHO has faced challenges in its dealings with Taiwan because, as a UN organization, it has to follow the UN’s principles on participation and rights.
The problems encountered by Brundtland and others like her in their attempts to help Taiwan stem from the nation holding fast to an obsolete national name, and the obsolete Constitution in which that name is enshrined.
The WHO is committed to preventing the spread of infectious diseases, which is in the interest of all of humanity. This is why Brundtland was able to convince the organization to help Taiwan in 2003.
However, most WHO members, as well as other international organizations in which Taiwan has sought participation, support China’s “one China” principle, and some even have leaders who are Chinese.
Brundtland said that during the SARS epidemic, some of the governments that were most opposed to working with Taiwan were responsible for the outbreak happening in the first place.
Even when Taiwan has achieved participation in various organizations in the past, it has often been mediated through Beijing, and required Taiwan to participate only as a guest under a different name.
The US Department of State on Oct. 26, 2016, reiterated its commitment to helping Taiwan achieve meaningful participation in Interpol.
The US opposed any decisions by organizations that unilaterally determine the status of Taiwan, US Department of State East Asian and Pacific Affairs Bureau spokeswoman Grace Choi said in an e-mail at the time.
“As a general matter, we support Taiwan’s membership in international organizations where statehood is not a requirement and support its meaningful participation, as appropriate, in organizations where its membership is not possible,” she wrote.
A month later, Chinese Deputy Minister of Public Security Meng Hongwei (孟宏偉) was chosen as the organization’s president. Since then, Taiwan has not made headway in its bid to work with Interpol.
In the same year, the US also expressed support for Taiwan’s participation in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Prior to that, Taiwan had joined the organization as an observer in 2013 when then-minister of foreign affairs David Lin (林永樂) announced a deal worked out with China that allowed Taiwan to participate as a guest under the name “Chinese Taipei CAA.”
Then-Democratic Progressive Party legislator Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) criticized the announcement as a “clear message to the international community that invitations for Taiwan to participate in international activities must go through China.”
It is evident today that Lin Chia-lung’s predictions about the nation’s international space narrowing were correct. Its inability to participate in the ICAO has most recently culminated in the unilateral opening of flight routes by China close to the median line in the Taiwan Strait.
An opinion poll published on Wednesday found that young Taiwanese adults aged 20 to 29 support the cross-strait “status quo” more strongly than they do Taiwanese nationalism.
The problem is that the “status quo” is an illusion. The reality is that China is ramping up pressure on Taiwan, squeezing it out of the international community, poaching its allies and draining its talent.
While many in the international community might disagree with China’s bullying of Taiwan, any action they take would end up hurting them economically.
Taiwan must empower its friends to help it by shedding its relic of a Constitution and declaring itself an independent nation named “Taiwan.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with